Legal Opinion

City of Kingfisher v. Pratt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1896PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from the District Court of Kingfisher County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Biebee, J.:

This cause is brought here by petition in error to reverse the judgment rendered by the district •court of Kingfisher county in favor of Wilson S. Pratt and against the city of Kingfisher in the sum of five hundred dollars for damages which the plaintiff sustained by reason of falling into a deep and and dangerous hole and excavation in the streets of said city.

The plaintiff filed his complaint in the cause on March 4, 1893, answer was filed on March 16, 1893, and judgment rendered on the 21st day of February, 1894.

The plaintiff assigns…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McMechan v. ChristySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Menten v. ShutteeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  2. Devault v. Merchants' Exch. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Green v. Incorporated Town of YeagerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen v. FurmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  5. Ahren-Ott Mfg. Co. v. CondonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API