Legal Opinion

Sweatt v. Marlboro Cotton Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 24, 1945No. 15757PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Associate Justice Fishburne

delivered the unanimous Opinion of the Court.

This was a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Code 1942, § 7035-1, et seq., initiated by the widow and children of John Sweatt on account of his death, which occurred July 22, 1943. The claim was opposed by Marlboro Cotton Mills, employer, and American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, insurance carrier, who are appealing from the judgment of the Circuit Court affirming an award of the South Carolina Industrial Commission in favor of the widow, Macie Hendricks Sweatt, and Fannie Sweatt Brigman, a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Green v. City of BennettsvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  2. Branch v. Pacific MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  3. Cromer v. Newberry Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  4. Cole v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  5. Ferguson v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kearse v. South Carolina Wildlife Resources DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  2. Windham v. CITY OF FLORENCESupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  3. Raley v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  4. Ricker v. Village Management Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  5. Walsh v. U. S. Rubber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API