Legal Opinion

Raley v. City of Camden

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 24, 1952No. 16671PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fishburne, Justice.

This is a Workmen’s Compensation case. James R. Raley, the respondent-appellant, who is the claimant, will herein be referred to as employee or claimant. The City of Camden, appellant-respondent, will generally be referred to as the employer. ■

The claimant, a man forty-seven years of age, had been an employee of the City of Camden for about nineteen years, —first as a police officer, then as tax collector, and finally as Commissioner of streets. For three or four years prior to December 28, 1948, while serving as Commissioner, he suffered from high blood pressure. Prior to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Green v. City of BennettsvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  2. Hiers v. BRUNSON CONST. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  3. Willis v. Aiken CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  4. Strawhorn v. J. A. Chapman Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  5. Smith v. Southern BuildersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kearse v. South Carolina Wildlife Resources DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  2. Ricker v. Village Management Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. Walsh v. U. S. Rubber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  4. Price v. B. F. Shaw Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
  5. Stokes v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API