Legal Opinion
Krause v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided August 21, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.
Plaintiff and defendant Lehigh Valley Railroad Company-, respectively, move for summary judgment. Service on defendant Lehigh Valley Coal Company was set aside, and the action has proceeded against defendant Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, hereinafter called the defendant.
This defendant is sued as guarantor upon two promissory notes of a series issued January 2, 1933, by the Lehigh Valley Coal Company, denominated “ Five year secured 6% gold notes, due January 1, 1938.” Thereby it promised to pay to the bearer or registered owner on the 1st day of January, 1938, the principal sum,, (in this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Batchelder v. Council Grove Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Cunningham v. Pressed Steel Car Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Cunningham v. Pressed Steel Car CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Watson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Friedman v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966