Legal Opinion

United States v. Catherine Decamp, Truck Insurance Exchange, Intervenor-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 25, 1973No. 26199PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ELY, Circuit Judge:

This wrongful death action was brought by the widow of Paul DeCamp against the United States under the Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80. The husband was fatally injured on June 28, 1967, during the course of his employment under a contract between his employer, Beecham, and the Army Corps of Engineers. The contract called for the removal and disposal of debris along the Salinas River near San Luis Obispo, California.

The injury occurred when DeCamp’s bulldozer made contact with a live willow tree. The tree snapped over the top of the brush rake,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Blessing v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Rowley v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. Phillip Hess v. Upper Mississippi Towing Corp. And Penlatex Barge Lines, Inc., Defendants- Fidelity & Casualty Co. Of New York, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Lloyd v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API