Legal Opinion

United States v. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 11, 1988No. 86-5050PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

This case presents a Sixth Amendment challenge to the application of the criminal forfeiture provisions of the Continuing Criminal Enterprise (CCE) statute, 21 U.S. C. § 853, to defense attorneys’ fees. Ap-pellee Caplin & Drysdale contends that forfeiture of attorneys’ fees violates the Sixth Amendment right to the assistance of counsel. We reject this challenge because there is no established Sixth Amendment right to pay an attorney with the illicit proceeds of drug transactions. The difficult policy choices posed by application of the forfeiture statutes to…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Forfeiture Hearing As To Caplin & Drysdale, CharteredCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API