Legal Opinion
Doctor v. Desmond
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided February 23, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Hearing on return of order to show cause why service of process should not be set aside.
1Opinion of the Court
Leaming, V. C.
The single question for determination at this time is whether this court has jurisdiction over a Pennsylvania corporation in a suit pending in this court, in which service of a subpoena ad respondendum was made on one Barlow, who was, at the time of the service, a director and treasurer of the Pennsylvania corporation, and in this state in attendance at a stockholders’ meeting of *78a corporation of this state as proxy for the Pennsylvania corporation for the purpose of voting stock owned by the Pennsylvania corporation in the corporation of this state, no other business of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Jameson v. Simonds Saw Co.California Court of Appeal · 1906
3Cited by5 opinions
- Litton Ind. Systems v. Kennedy Van Saun Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Quigley Co., Inc. v. Asbestos Limited, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
- Ruff v. Manhattan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Thomson-CSF Components Corp. v. Hathaway Instruments, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
- Brown v. John P. Smythe Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925