Legal Opinion
Le Savoy v. Harnes
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 4, 1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Martin Evans, J.
In this malpractice action, defendants Jack Harnes, M.D., a former coemployee of plaintiff, and American International Group (AIG), plaintiff’s former employer, move for summary judgment on the ground that the exclusive remedy for plaintiff is under the Workers’ Compensation Law.
The complaint, as amplified by the bill of particulars, alleges that plaintiff, who had received occasional medical care and treatment from medical employees of AIG from 1978, when she was first employed until September 1981 when she resigned her employment, also was given routine…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Garcia v. IsersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Goldstein v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Claim of Rheinwald v. Builders' Brick & Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Bednarski v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Golini v. NachtigallNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hawksby v. DepietroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999