Legal Opinion

Elwonger v. Career Academy, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided November 30, 1971No. Nos. 71-C-409, 71-C-429PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.

The defendant has filed a motion for a more definite statement, pursuant to Rule 12(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in each of the above-entitled cases. In particular, the defendant seeks “a concise statement of the evidentiary facts” upon which the plaintiffs base their claims that the defendant has vio*86lated certain provisions of the Sherman and Clayton Antitrust Acts; the defendant also asks for “a statement of the injuries and damages” alleged to be attributable to such violations, if different from the general statement of injuries…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  2. Gas Consumers Ass'n v. Philadelphia Gas Works Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Carolina Scenic Stages, Inc. v. Greyhound Corp.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1965
  4. Lodge 1916 v. General Electric Co. X-ray DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1970
  5. Beagelman v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Juneau Square Corp. v. First Wisconsin National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1973
  2. Essex International, Inc. v. Industra Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1974
  3. Elwonger v. Career Academy, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API