Legal Opinion

Beagelman v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 27, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASHIN, District Judge.

The defendants have each moved for an order, pursuant to Rule 10 (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., requiring plaintiffs to file an amended complaint stating in separate counts the claims alleged in the complaint. The complaint alleges an action pursuant to the Sherman and Clayton Acts, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2, 13 and 14, and § 340 of the General Business Law of New York.

The complaint is divided into six ■ sections dealing with(1) Jurisdiction and Venue;(2) Parties;(3) Co-conspirators;(4) Nature of Trade and Commerce Involved;(5) The Conspiracy;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  2. Gins v. Mauser Plumbing Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Michigan Gas & Electric Co. v. American Electric Power Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  2. Elwonger v. Career Academy, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API