Barry v. Tanner
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Douglas County District Court determining that Christopher Tanner was not a permissive user of a vehicle owned by insured Joseph Dervin and dismissing garnishment proceedings against Greatway Insurance Company (Greatway), Dervin’s insurer. Rhonda S. Barry appealed this judgment to the Nebraska Court of Appeals, and the matter was transferred to this court upon our own motion. We conclude that Tanner qualifies as an “insured” under the insurance policy of Dervin and, therefore, reverse the judgment and remand the matter to the district court with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arndt v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
- Koterzina v. Copple Chevrolet, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- MFA Ins. Companies v. MendenhallNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
- Watts v. WattsNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Hull Ex Rel. Hull v. Allstate InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barnett v. PetersNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Progressive Northern Insurance v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Farr v. Designer Phosphate & Premix International, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. D.F. Lanoha Landscape Nursery, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Kruger v. ShramekNebraska Court of Appeals · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.