Legal Opinion
Stahly v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 18, 2009No. 06-35041PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*656MEMORANDUM*
Plaintiffs Dave Stahly and Mel Davis, who are trustees of (respectively) a Pension Trust Plan and a 401 (k) Plan administered by the United Association Local No. 290 Plumber Steamfitter Shipfitter Industry (“Union”), appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendant Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. Reviewing de novo, Dominguez-Curry v. Nev. Transp. Dep’t, 424 F.3d 1027, 1033 (9th Cir.2005), we affirm.
1. The district court did not err in granting summary judgment to Defendant on the contract claims. The text of the 1999 written contracts is clear and unambiguous:…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sylvia Dominguez-Curry v. Nevada Transportation Department Roc StaceyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- American Title Insurance Company v. Lacelaw CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Conway v. Pacific UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Beacon Associates LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Fatnani v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2024