Legal Opinion · Dissent

Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2002No. 01-1899Published

1DissentDiane S. Sykes, J.

¶ 56. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. I read nothing in Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 (1985,) or State ex rel. Tracy v. Henry, 219 Wis. 53, 262 N.W 222 (1935), that precludes application of the after-acquired evidence doctrine of McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co., 513 U.S. 352 (1995), in a remedy hearing under the civil service code in order to determine the proper measure of back pay damages for wrongful termination.

¶ 57. The McKennon after-acquired evidence rule allows later-discovered evidence of employee misconduct supplying independent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Magyar v. Wisconsin Health Care Liability Insurance PlanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Brogdon v. City of KlawockAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Tracy v. HenryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API