Brogdon v. City of Klawock
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
Appellant, Jimmy Ray Brogdon, was dismissed from his position as Officer-in-Charge with the Klawock Public Safety Department. 1 He challenged his dismissal by filing a grievance. After a formal hearing the grievance committee 2 reached a decision which it announced on the record as follows:
We are back on record to determine— the committee has come back with a recommendation.
The committee agrees that in the preter-mination hearing, Items 1, 2 and 3 were in violation. And we cannot determine guilt or innocence in a criminal matter. If this was illegal, as so stated in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reust v. Alaska Petroleum Contractors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Domke v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Reust v. Alaska Petroleum Contractors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005