Legal Opinion

Brogdon v. City of Klawock

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1997No. S-7094, S-7164PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

Appellant, Jimmy Ray Brogdon, was dismissed from his position as Officer-in-Charge with the Klawock Public Safety Department. 1 He challenged his dismissal by filing a grievance. After a formal hearing the grievance committee 2 reached a decision which it announced on the record as follows:

We are back on record to determine— the committee has come back with a recommendation.

The committee agrees that in the preter-mination hearing, Items 1, 2 and 3 were in violation. And we cannot determine guilt or innocence in a criminal matter. If this was illegal, as so stated in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reust v. Alaska Petroleum Contractors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Domke v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Reust v. Alaska Petroleum Contractors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API