Legal Opinion
Balentine v. Thaler
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 21, 2012No. 12-70023PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The court having been polled and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (FED.RApp. P. and 5TH Cir. R. 35), the Rehearing En Banc has been DENIED by separate order on this day.
John Lezell Balentine’s motion for a stay of execution pending consideration of petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED as MOOT.
On August 17, 2012, this panel determined that the district court had properly applied one of our precedents to require denial of Balentine’s Rule 60(b) motion. See Ibarra v. Thaler, 691 F.3d 677, at 685, 2012 WL 3537826, at *6 n.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Beunka Adams v. Rick Thaler, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Ramiro Ibarra v. Rick Thaler, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Ramiro Ibarra v. Rick Thaler, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
3Cited by4 opinions
- Arturo Diaz v. William Stephens, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Cleve Foster v. Rick Thaler, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Bradley v. ShawDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2024
- Ruiz v. Director, TDCJ-CIDDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2023