Legal Opinion

R.W. v. Schrein

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 2002No. S-00-808 through S-00-812PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

NATURE OF CASE

Appellants in this case were, as children, patients of Daniel B. Schrein, M.D., an Omaha pediatrician. As adults, appellants brought actions against Schrein to recover damages for sexual abuse alleged to have been perpetrated by Schrein during the course of medical treatment. Appellants obtained default judgments against Schrein and commenced garnishment proceedings against Schrein’s professional liability insurer, The Medical Protective Company of Fort Wayne, Indiana (Medical Protective). The district court concluded that appellants’ claims were not covered by Schrein’s…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Princeton Insurance v. ChunmuangSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  3. Hirst v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Smith v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Roe v. Federal InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. DalyNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Sturzenegger v. FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS'HOMENebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Hamilton v. NestorNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Poulton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompaniesNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Herrera v. Fleming Companies, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API