Legal Opinion

Sawers Grain Co. v. Teagarden, Rec.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1925No. 12,295PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Appellant filed a claim against appellee as receiver of the Raub Grain Company, the same being based upon an account stated, claiming balance due thereon in the sum of $38,751.06, such account being accompanied by two notes of the Raub company to appellant, each in the sum of $10,000. These two notes represented part of the said sum of $38,751.06, the amount of the same having been charged back for nonpayment according to the custom of merchants. There was no formal complaint other than the account and the notes. Appellee answered in denial; non est factum to the notes; want of consideration;…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Board of Trade of Chicago v. Christie Grain & Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Irwin v. WilliarSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Sondheim v. GilbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Bancroft v. DumasSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
  5. Gettys v. NewburgerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Damler v. BaineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Makeever v. BarkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API