Legal Opinion

Damler v. Baine

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1943No. 17,082PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlanagan, J.

This action was brought by appellee, James C. Baine, against the appellants, John C. Damler and Pauline Damler, by a complaint which asserts the liability of appellants to appellee on an implied contract to indemnify the appellee who, as surety for the appellants, had pledged certain stocks and deposited certain cash with a broker with whom the appellants carried accounts in which they purchased stocks on margin.

Trial was had to the court which found the facts specially and stated its conclusions of law in favor of appellee. Judgment followed the conclusions.

Errors assigned on appeal are that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sondheim v. GilbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Gieseke v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Wilson v. National Fowler BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Keesling v. FrazierIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Bailey & Graham v. PhillipsU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Crown Point v. Lake CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Cook v. BallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  3. Money Store Investment Corp. v. SummersIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Harbour Town Associates, Ltd. v. City of NoblesvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Mallis v. FaraclasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API