Legal Opinion

Stutts v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 2009No. COA09-52PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Robert C., Judge.

Plaintiff Robert Stutts appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment to defendants The Travelers Indemnity Company, St. Paul Travelers Insurance Company, Travelers Property and Casualty, The Travelers Insurance Group Inc., The Travelers Group, and The Travelers Insurance Company. Plaintiff’s main contention on appeal is that the “filed rate” doctrine is inapplicable in this case and thus the trial court erred in entering summary judgment on that basis. Because we conclude that the “filed rate” doctrine does apply and bars plaintiff’s claim, we affirm.

Facts

I…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dobson v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Summey v. BarkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stutts v. Travelers Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. BurgdoffCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API