Legal Opinion

Sims v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1948No. 16153PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

Ground one of the amended motion for new trial assigns error on the following charge of the court: “The law says that, to warrant a conviction by circumstantial evidence alone, the proven facts must not only be consistent with the hypothesis of guilt, but must exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused.” It is contended that the charge as given was confusing, misleading, and unsound as an abstract principle of law; it was not comprehensive enough on the degree of proof required to authorize a conviction, on circumstantial evidence; the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Goldin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Battle v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Welborn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  3. State v. FreemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Hardy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Wingfield v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API