Legal Opinion

Brough v. Bell Pike Northeast

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 3, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

The employee, George Brough, appeals from a pro forma decree entered in Superi- or Court, Cumberland County, incorporating a decision by the Workers’ Compensation Commission. The Commissioner had denied Brough’s petition for award of compensation, concluding that the evidence presented was insufficient to sustain the employee’s burden on the issue of causation. Brough challenges the decree on the grounds that there was no competent evidence to support the Commissioner’s conclusion. We affirm the pro forma judgment below.

The evidence showed that Brough began work as a pipe…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dunton v. Eastern Fine Paper CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Guerrette v. Fraser Paper, LimitedSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  3. Bruton v. City of BathSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. Mortimer v. Harry C. Crooker & Sons, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  5. Rowe v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Masters MacHine Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Knox v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API