Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Bath Iron Works Corp.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 10, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFRESNE, Active Retired Justice.

The employee, Michael Rowe, appeals from a pro forma decree of the Superior Court that affirmed a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission denying his petition for award of compensation. Rowe challenges the decree on the ground that there was no competent evidence in the record to support the Commissioner’s conclusion that there was no causal connection between any present disability the employee might have and the work-related accident that was the subject of the petition. We affirm the pro forma judgment below.

Rowe was employed in an apprenticeship…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dunton v. Eastern Fine Paper CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Dailey v. Pinecap, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  3. Willette v. Statler Tissue Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  4. Bradbury v. General Foods CorporationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
  5. Parent v. Great Northern Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Masters MacHine Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Bruton v. City of BathSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Brough v. Bell Pike NortheastSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. Franzose v. Alco Packing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. Silva v. New England Group, Maremont Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API