Legal Opinion

Emi Limited v. William Bennett, Kenneth Cory, Mary Ann Graves, and Gerald H. Goldberg

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 23, 1984No. 82-4611PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:

The district court dismissed this action on the ground that EMI, Limited (“EMI”) lacked standing. EMI Ltd. v. Bennett, 560 F.Supp. 134, 135-36 (N.D.Cal.1982). We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

Capitol Industries-EMI, Inc. (“Capitol”), is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in California. Capitol is in the business of recording phonograph records and tapes. Capitol’s business is conducted almost exclusively in the United States.

EMI, a United Kingdom corporation, owns the majority of the stock of Capitol. EMI owns a group of subsidiaries, most of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Societe De Conditionnement en Aluminium v. Hunter Engineering Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. K-B Trucking Company and Keith Collins, Cross-Appellants v. Riss International Corporation and World Leasing, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Alcan Aluminium Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Whelan v. AbellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  4. David H. Bruce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API