Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 27, 1986No. 72018PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

Appellant was convicted at a bench trial of cruelty to animals, and he appeals.

1. Appellant contends the court erred by convicting him because the acts charged in the accusation do not constitute a criminal act under Georgia law and there was no evidence of intent, malice, knowledge or criminal negligence.

OCGA § 16-12-4 (a) provides: “A person is guilty of a misdemeanor when his act, omission, or neglect causes unjustifiable physical pain, suffering, or death to any living animal.” The evidence disclosed that appellant kept several Rottweiler dogs on his 30-acre farm, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Humphrey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  4. Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Turnipseed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Cox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. Savage v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Charlotte Landy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026
  5. Cotton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API