Legal Opinion

Driskell v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 17, 2005No. 26507PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY W. BATES, Chief Judge.

Ronald Driskell (“Driskell”) appeals from a judgment sustaining the revocation of his driver’s license by the Director of Revenue (“Director”), pursuant to § 577.041 for refusing to submit to a chemical test of his blood alcohol content. 1 We affirm.

On March 7, 2004, Driskell was arrested for driving while intoxicated by Richland police officer Kimbly Elrod (“Officer El-rod”). Officer Elrod read Driskell the implied consent warning mandated by § 577.041.1, but Driskell refused to submit to a breathalyzer test. On the Director’s behalf, Officer Elrod issued…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hinnah v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  2. Dillon v. Director of Revenue, StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Laney v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MO.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Allen v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Baker v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kimbrell v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Rogers v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Ridge v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Owen v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API