Legal Opinion

Supreme Council v. Carley

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On hearing under decree of interpleader, and on answers and facts admitted.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Fleet, V. C.

The contest in this case is between two females, each of whom ■.claims to have been the wife of one Harvey Carley during his *643life, and since his death to be his widow. Carley died January 29th, 1893. Several years prior to his death, Carley became a member of a corporation known as the Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum and a contributor to its widows’ and orphans’ benefit fund. As such contributor, he procured the corporation, in September, 1882, to issue a certificate by which it promised to pay his wife Sarah, on his death, out of its widows’ and orphans’ fund, a sum not…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Second National Bank of Phila. v. ThompsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  2. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. AckermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  3. Todd v. Policemen's, Etc., Fund of City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Weinberg v. WeinbergNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  5. Meade v. MuellerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API