Legal Opinion
Denny, Banking Commissioner v. Fishter
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided March 20, 1931PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Dietzman
Reversing.
In September, 1926, the Farmers’ & Traders’ Bank of Maysville held the note of Pickett and Burgess in the principal sum of about $12,000, secured by a mortgage on a piece of real estate in the city of Maysville. This note was long past due, and its makers not only were behind in their interest payments, but were also insolvent. The note was indeed a frozen asset. The bank at that time was getting in a more or less straitened condition, and in order to liquefy this frozen asset, its vice president, H. W. Cole, devised the following scheme: The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Franklin National Bank v. WhiteheadIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Pauly v. O'BrienU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1895
- Sickles v. . HeroldNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- State Bank v. KirkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Cedar State Bank v. OlsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. BergoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Lem C. Bryan, Receiver v. Ernest A. Bartlett, Jr., Afton Borum, Hoyt Borum, and E. M. Clem, Lem C. Bryan, Receiver v. Gaylord B. RobersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Williams v. Denny, Banking CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.