Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Defabian Shannon

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 2, 1996No. 95-2367Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCoffey, Circuit Judge

I agree with the majority’s decision in two respects. I agree that the district court did not commit clear error when it found that Shannon’s involvement in a prior uncharged homicide warranted an upward departure. Likewise, I concur in the judgment that the district court did not abuse its discretion in applying the doctrine of the law of the ease. I dissent because I am convinced that Shannon’s Wisconsin state court conviction for the felony charge of second-degree sexual assault of a child represents a prior conviction for a “crime of violence” under § 4B1.2(l)(ii) of the Guidelines, and I…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API