In Re Roberts
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The circumstances provocative of the present proceeding can be stated concisely. The solicitor of the complainant in a cause now pending in this court desired to elicit the testimony de beneesse of the respondent as a witness. To that end he undertook to pursue the statutory expedient. N.J.S.A. 2:100-10, et seq. The solicitor, however, obtained from the master before whom the examination was contemplated, a summons which was addressed to, and duly served upon, the respondent. The respondent is a lieutenant in the United States Navy and was then engaged in a course of instruction at Princeton.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kempson v. KempsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- Sawtelle v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1891
- Dodd v. UnaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1885
- Oddo v. SaibinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Snegon v. Consolidated, C., Ins. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Franklin v. FranklinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948