Legal Opinion

Farmers Bank of the Delaware v. Odom

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided May 9, 1968Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’HORA, Judge.

This is an action initiated by defendants who have filed a petition for a Rule to Show Cause why a judgment should not be opened. After plaintiff’s answer was filed, defendants moved for summary judgment. Defendants also have filed a counterclaim for damages plus costs and attorney fees.

On April 24, 1967, defendants purchased a certain 20 foot motor boat from Taylor Products, Inc. In addition to a cash down payment of $450.00, defendants executed a Conditional Sales Contract and a Judgment Note, which instruments were subsequently assigned to plaintiff.

On May 3, 1967,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Frantz Equipment Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. Bulldog Concrete Forms Sales Corp. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  3. Capitol District L. A. W. Corp. v. BlakeAlbany City Court · 1930
  4. Commercial Credit Corporation v. SwiderskiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1963
  5. Bowden v. Sussex Studebaker, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API