LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF NC v. State
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs (“plaintiffs-Libertarians”) and intervenors (“intervenors-Greens”) appeal from the trial court’s determination that N.C.G.S. §§ 163-96(a)(l)-(2) and 163-97.1 do not violate Article I, Sections 1, 10, 12, 14, and 19, or Article VI, Sections 1 and 6, of the North Carolina Constitution. For the reasons stated, we affirm.
The parties stipulate to the following facts:
1. Historically states, including North Carolina, have imposed requirements on political parties to gain and retain recognition for their parties and their affiliated candidates.
*3252. To gain recognition in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jenness v. FortsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- American Party of Texas v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tashjian v. Republican Party of ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Libertarian Party v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
- Davis v. UrquizaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Shallotte Partners, LLC v. Berkadia Commercial Mortg., LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF NORTH CAROLINA v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF NC v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.