United States v. Nye County Nevada Bernie C. Merlino, Nye County Assessor
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
The United States challenges Nye County’s imposition of a tax on Areata Associates, Inc. (Areata), a defense contractor. The United States argues that the tax violates the Constitution because it, in effect, is a tax upon property of the United States. The district court entered judgment for the United States, enjoined further assessments of the tax by the County and adjudged the County liable for the taxes previously paid. We hold that the tax Nye County levied on Areata is an ad valorem tax on property owned by the United States government. As such, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- United States v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. County of FresnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. SiebertSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- California Farm Bureau Federation v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Ohio Cellular Rsa Ltd. Partnership v. Board of Public WorksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- United States v. Nye CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Rainhold Holding Co. v. Freehold TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.