Legal Opinion

County of Stanislaus v. Ross

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1979No. 781DC768PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Judge.

The defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. In support of this assignment, the defendant contends that the motion should have been granted because the complaint fails to state where he was employed or the amount of his earnings. We do not agree. The Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act requires that the plaintiff’s complaint “state the name and, so far as known to the plaintiff, the address and circumstances of the defendant and his dependents for whom support is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tidwell v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Childers v. ChildersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Melzer v. WitsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Plott v. PlottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State, Iowa Department of Social Services Ex Rel. Blakeman v. BlakemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  5. Jaramillo v. JaramilloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API