Legal Opinion

Town of Glastonbury v. Sakon

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 28, 2018No. AC39907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

In this tax lien foreclosure action, 1 the defendant John Alan Sakon 2 appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the plaintiff's request for attorney's fees and costs. On appeal, the defendant claims that the attorney's fees awarded by the court were excessive and unreasonable. We conclude that the amount of attorney's fees awarded to the plaintiff did not constitute an abuse of discretion and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.

This court's recent decision in the same matter, Glastonbury v. Sakon , 172 Conn. App. 646 , 161 A.3d 657 (2017) (per curiam), sets forth…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Onge, Stewart, Johnson & Reens, LLC v. Media Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  2. LPP Mortgage, Ltd. v. LynchConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. Kelib v. Connecticut Housing Finance AuthorityConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. State v. FranklinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. Town of Glastonbury v. SakonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. NAI Elite, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  2. In re: SakonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
  3. Sclafani Properties, LLC v. Sport-N-Life Distributing, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API