Legal Opinion
State v. Franklin
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 23, 2009No. AC 28483PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendant, Michael Franklin, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree as an accessory in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-59 (a) (5) and 53a-8. On appeal, the defendant claims that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On May 30, 2005, at approximately noon, the victim, Elliott Snider, and his friend, Patrick Priest, witnessed a fight between two men at Neon Park in Norwalk. One of the men involved in…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- California v. TybergSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. JOSE G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. LinarteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
4Cited by6 opinions
- Downing v. DragoneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- State v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Town of Glastonbury v. SakonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Hudson City Savings Bank v. HellmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.