In re Stephen Daniel A.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*736As a respondent in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother had both a constitutional and a statutory right to the assistance of counsel (see US Const Amend VI; NY Const, art I, § 6; Family Ct Act § 262 [a] [i]; Matter of Jung [State Commn. on Jud. Conduct], 11 NY3d 365, 373 [2008]; Matter of Ella B., 30 NY2d 352, 356-357 [1972]; Matter of Casey N, 59 AD3d 625, 627 [2009]). A party may waive that right and proceed without counsel (see People v Arroyo, 98 NY2d 101, 103 [2002]; Matter of Guzzo v Guzzo, 50 AD3d 687, 688 [2008]; Matter of Jetter v Jetter, 43 AD3d 821, 822…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. ArroyoNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. ProvidenceNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- In re Ella B.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. SlaughterNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- In the Matter of Kathleen K.New York Court of Appeals · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Belmonte v. BatistaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Cecile D. (Kassia D.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Matter of Ryan v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Bianco v. Bruce-RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Saber v. SacconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.