Shade v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Brock Shade appeals an order summarily denying his postconviction claims filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Shade’s postconviction motion asserted seven grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court correctly denied grounds four, five, and six, and we affirm without elaboration. However, it erred in denying Shade’s remaining claims.
In exchange for a significantly reduced sentence, Shade resolved his seven cases involving multiple drug-related charges by pleading guilty in six cases and nolo con-tendere in the other. As part of his nolo plea, Shade…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Spera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Tidwell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Helms v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Dickie v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Sarasota County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
- Julius Danal Bunch v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024