Legal Opinion

Alejandro v. Adm. Unemployment Comp. Act, No. 128551 (Feb. 8, 1996)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 8, 1996No. 128551Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The defendant's Motion for Judgment was scheduled and heard on December 18, 1996. The pro se plaintiff was present and in court. This appeal concerns the denial of commission to award unemployment benefits to the plaintiff. The Administrator, the Referee and the Board of Review all concluded that the plaintiff voluntarily left suitable employment without sufficient job connected cause, and therefore, denied benefits to the plaintiff.

It is well settled that the Superior Court does not re-try the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Finkenstein v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Johnson v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API