Legal Opinion
State v. Heuck
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 3, 1991No. 82A01-9103-CR-72PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Chief Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The State filed this appeal from the grant of Gordon N. Heuck's motion to suppress evidence which effectively precluded further prosecution. We reverse and remand.
ISSUE
We rephrase the sole issue on appeal as: Did the trial court err in granting Heuck's motion to suppress evidence finding that the police officer's stop was a "pretext" to search for evidence of other crimes?
FACTS
On May 22, 1990, Evansville Police Detective Whitlow received a call from a confidential informant that Heuck was at Har-pole's Tavern. Detective Whitlow was aware that Heuck…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Maryland v. MacOnSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Gregory Lynn Cummins, United States of America v. Timothy Akins, A/K/A Michael MayfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Timothy Andrew Smith, Stephen Lawrence SwindellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. William O. TriggCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HollinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Black v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993