Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. Seidlitz Paint and Varnish Company

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 13, 1966No. 51386PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGER, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff, George Rodgers, sued to recover commissions which he claimed were due to him with interest, for services rendered to defendants from November 1, 1958, to April 1, 1962, when his employment terminated. The jury found in his favor for the full amount of such commissions $17,663.22, but disregarded the question of interest. Upon after-trial motion of defendants the trial court set aside the judgment and entered judgment for the defendants “for the reason that, under the law and the evidence, plaintiff is equitably estopped from asserting his claim.” It appears…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cluck v. AbeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Charles F. Curry and Company v. HedrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. State Upon the Information of Shartel v. Missouri Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. Robbins v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. Rogers v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. White v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Brooks v. CookseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Long v. HuffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. State Ex Rel. Mather v. CarnesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Commercial Credit Corp. v. Joplin Automobile Auction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API