Legal Opinion
Heather Corp. v. Community Tele-Communications, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 17, 1981No. 80CA1006PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Judge.
Defendants appeal the district court judgment that Cortez City Ordinance No. 532 is invalid because it is in violation of the Cortez City Charter. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Ordinance No. 532 authorizes the defendant, Community Tele-Communications, Inc., (Community) to install and operate a cable television system within the city limits of Cortez. The ordinance gives Community the non-exclusive right to operate for an initial renewable term of 10 years, subject to certain restrictions and limitations.
The Heather Corporation filed suit in district court requesting a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McPhee & McGinnity Co. v. Union Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- City of Englewood v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Kornegay v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Finney v. EstesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Archuleta v. ArchuletaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
3Cited by2 opinions
- Community Tele-Communications, Inc. v. Heather Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Community Tele-Communications, Inc. v. Heather Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984