Legal Opinion
People v. Schmidt
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 3, 1941No. Civ. No. 11877PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Plaintiff sued to recover from defendant license fees of $250 and $500 respectively, alleged to have become due from defendant by reason of the issuance to defendant of two beer importer’s licenses under the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act of 1935. (Stats. 1935, Chap. 330, Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1937, Act 3796.) Plaintiff had judgment and defendant appeals.
*257Shortly after said act became effective, certain interested parties commenced an action entitled Young’s Market Co., et al. v. State Board of Equalization et al., in the United States District Court for the Southern District…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Bd. of Equalization of Cal. v. Young's Market Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Trippet v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. CraycroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
- United States v. JourdenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
- Town of Gallup v. Gallup Cold Storage Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by2 opinions
- Estate of CookeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Doctors General Hospital v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957