Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Shepley

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1989No. 16112Published

1DissentHenderson, Justice

We are not confronted with reconstructing a day’s testimony such as in Dupris, cited in the majority opinion.

We are reviewing the reconstruction of closing argument.1 And more specifically, a highly damaging and improper statement of the prosecutor in closing argument.

The statement is as follows: “Even defendant’s attorney doesn’t believe the defendant.” An affidavit, to reconstruct the record, to establish that this statement was made was prepared by defendant’s trial counsel. Under Dupris, this was an alternative. Said affidavit was not refuted. Under Sioux Falls v. Johnson, cited in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BrammerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. ReddingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. DornbuschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. OlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. WebbSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API