Legal Opinion

Gray v. Russell

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 25, 1993No. 75449PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge.

In this case we revisit the “firefighter’s rule,” which, under certain circumstances, precludes tort recovery by public safety officers who are injured in the line of duty. Because the firefighter’s rule is an exception to the rescue doctrine, it does not bar an action for injuries suffered by a police officer while performing routine duties in a nonemergency situation when those injuries are caused by a landowner’s ordinary negligence. We reverse the judgment in favor of respondents and remand.

I

On review of a defendant’s motion for summary judgment, this Court views the record…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wagner v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Krause v. US Truck Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  3. Nastasio v. CinnamonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. Wells v. GoforthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  5. Anderson v. CinnamonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Thompson v. SummersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Carter v. KinneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. Hallquist v. MiddenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Orth v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  5. Wagener v. BurmeisterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API