Legal Opinion · Dissent

Novo Nordisk A/S v. Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 14, 2010No. 2010-1001Published

1DissentDyk, Circuit Judge

In 2003, Congress enacted the counterclaim provision of the Hatch-Waxman Act in order to prevent manipulative practices by patent holders with respect to the Orange Book listings. These practices were designed to delay the onset of competition from generic drug manufacturers. See Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, Pub.L. No. 108-173, § 1101(a)(2)(C), 117 Stat.2066, 2452 (codified at 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(5)(C)(ii)) (“the counterclaim amendment”). In my view, the majority, in reversing the district court, now construes the statute contrary to its manifest…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API