Legal Opinion

Hatzis v. United States Fuel Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1933No. 5071PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLAND, Justice.

Ulyssis Hatzis, a minor, by his guardian ad litem, brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries which he alleged he sustained because of negligence of defendant. The court, at the close of the evidence, directed the jury to return a verdict of no cause of action and entered judgment thereon for defendant. Plaintiff appeals and assigns error of the trial court in granting defendant’s motion for directed verdict, and in denying plaintiff’s motion for new trial.

Plaintiff, a boy of seven years, was on September 20, 1926, severely injured by the discharge of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hines v. WillcoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Eckart v. KielSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Bogdon v. Los Angeles & S. L. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Wilson v. WoodruffUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Larson v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hogsett v. HannaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Coggins v. GregorioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  3. Roberts v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Lake v. EmighMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Ripple v. Mahoning National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API