Wack v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bt
Keller, J.,
The plaintiff obtained a verdict against the defendant company in an action of trespass. The court below entered judgment for the defendant, Non obstante veredicto, on the ground of plaintiff’s contributory negligence. In this appeal all disputes as to the facts and the inferences reasonably to be drawn from them must be resolved in favor of the plaintiff.
Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, is a one-way street, vehicular traffic moving eastward. Defendant’s street car line runs in the middle of the street with vehicles traveling the same direction on both sides of it.
A police…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gilles v. LeasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Scalet v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
3Cited by7 opinions
- Byrne v. Schultz (Stone)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Mahan v. RichardsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
- Ferguson v. CharisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Schroeder v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Harrington v. PugarelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.