Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Pugarelli

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1942No. Appeal, 61PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

This is an action in trespass instituted by James Harrington, appellant, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him as the result of being struck by a truck driven by James Pugarelli, appellee, while crossing the right-angle intersection of Franklin Avenue and Spruce Street, in the City of Scranton. The jury found a verdict in favor of appellant in the sum of $2,800. Appellee filed a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, which the court en banc granted, after argument, and judgment was, accordingly, entered for appellee. This appeal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Newman v. Protective Motor Service Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Dando v. BrobstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Johnson v. FrenchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. MacKin v. Patterson, AppellantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Altsman v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martino v. AdourianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Lambert v. PolenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Tanner v. Pennsylvania Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. McKeough v. WitmanSuperior Court of Delaware · 1956
  5. Deibold v. SommervilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API