Legal Opinion
United States v. Amiel Cueto
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 31, 1998No. 97-3439PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
After a jury trial, Amiel Cueto was convicted of one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and three counts of obstruction of justice, in violation of the omnibus clause of 18 U.S.C. § 1503. The district court sentenced Cueto to 87 months imprisonment and imposed monetary penalties. Cueto now appeals his convictions and sentence, arguing that: (1) the conviction for conspiracy to defraud is invalid because of constitutional infirmities as well as insufficiency of the evidence; (2) the convictions for obstruction of justice are…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- United States v. Ioanis v. PanerasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Peter SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Jordie CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Roosevelt D. ValleryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.