Legal Opinion
State v. Roldan
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 23, 2004No. 2002-743PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.
The defendant, Angel Roldan, was indicted on one count of being a drug enterprise leader, and three separate counts of conspiracy to sell cocaine, crack cocaine, and methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) or ecstasy. See RSA 318-B:2, I, XII (Supp. 2003); RSA 629:3 (Supp. 2003). Following a jury trial in the Superior Court (Groff, J.), he was convicted on all four counts. We affirm.
In the summer and fall of 2000, the New Hampshire State Police Narcotics Investigation Unit (NIU), the Manchester and Nashua police departments, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, and other agencies began a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. BlackmerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Victor Manuel Lee Armijo, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- State v. HammondSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- State v. DecostaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- Barking Dog, Ltd. v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- People v. Munoz-CastenedaColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. LavoieSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Roldan v Reilley, WardenDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.